Miss State
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
338  Rhianwedd Price FR 20:42
360  Cornelia Griesche SO 20:44
482  Emma Neigel JR 20:55
533  Katie Huston SR 21:01
726  Lisa Ziegler FR 21:15
875  Jodie McGuff JR 21:25
1,129  Carmen Brothers JR 21:41
1,835  Evie Savage JR 22:24
2,606  Madison Milhoan SO 23:15
National Rank #94 of 340
South Region Rank #8 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 3.3%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 25.2%
Top 10 in Regional 99.4%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Rhianwedd Price Cornelia Griesche Emma Neigel Katie Huston Lisa Ziegler Jodie McGuff Carmen Brothers Evie Savage Madison Milhoan
Charlotte Invitational (Green) 09/28 22:24
Charlotte Invitational (Gold) 09/28 1204 21:13 21:16 21:37 21:38 22:22 22:35
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/18 1051 21:07 20:59 20:51 20:44 21:19 21:21 21:41 22:27 23:13
SEC Championships 11/01 966 21:03 20:40 20:40 20:53 20:51 21:01 21:41 22:24 24:18
South Region Championships 11/15 958 20:17 20:33 21:05 21:10 21:14 21:39 21:22





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 3.3% 29.7 765 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.6
Region Championship 100% 6.9 230 2.1 4.9 7.7 10.5 13.5 16.8 18.0 17.3 8.7 0.5 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rhianwedd Price 3.6% 163.0
Cornelia Griesche 3.5% 163.2
Emma Neigel 3.3% 188.8
Katie Huston 3.3% 204.5
Lisa Ziegler 3.3% 228.0
Jodie McGuff 3.3% 238.2
Carmen Brothers 3.3% 246.7


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rhianwedd Price 30.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.3 2.9 3.4 2.9 3.1 3.6
Cornelia Griesche 32.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.7 1.1 1.3 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.6 3.1 2.9
Emma Neigel 44.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.9
Katie Huston 51.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5
Lisa Ziegler 67.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Jodie McGuff 79.3
Carmen Brothers 98.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2.1% 100.0% 2.1 2.1 2
3 4.9% 20.3% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 3.9 1.0 3
4 7.7% 1.6% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.1 4
5 10.5% 10.5 5
6 13.5% 0.1% 0.0 13.4 0.0 6
7 16.8% 16.8 7
8 18.0% 18.0 8
9 17.3% 17.3 9
10 8.7% 8.7 10
11 0.5% 0.5 11
12 0.0% 0.0 12
13 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 3.3% 2.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 96.7 2.1 1.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Georgia 6.1% 1.0 0.1
Tennessee 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Auburn 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Total 0.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0